dacentec 的 25 美元 8T 的机子一直很抢手 , 每次出现一会就会被人秒光 . 这次随便弄了一台来跑跑看 , 供大家参考 .
这台机子硬盘是由 2T2+1T4 构成的 . 我这台机子几个硬盘都是通电 3 万小时 以上的硬盘了 …. 据说还有 7 万小时的盘 . 所以 , 如果要用来放些比较重要的东西的话 , 还是要组软 Raid, 这样无形中间就降低了容量的利用率 .
网络嘛 , 由于是在北卡罗来纳 , 美国的东南部 , 所以国内的网络肯定一般 … 默认的是 1G 的口 10T 的流量 .( 如果需要升级到 100M 不限流量需要额外 +5 美元 )
另外 CPU 确实 蛮垃圾的 – – 不过这种存储型的机子 , 也不指望啥了 …
网络测试
Test IP 199.255.156.6
Test Site http://mirror.dacentec.com
Test Files
http://mirror.dacentec.com/1000MB.bin
http://mirror.dacentec.com/100MB.bin
http://mirror.dacentec.com/10MB.bin
完整的测试报告
综合信息:
CPU 型号: | Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 1385 |
CPU 核数: | 4 |
CPU 主频: | 800.000 MHz |
内存: | 7869 MB |
SWAP : | 7999 MB |
IP 地域信息: | 美国 北卡罗来纳州 勒诺 centrilogic.com |
备注: | dacentec |
测试时间 : | 2018-04-01 14:16:11 |
IO 测试结果:
第一次测试: | 75.8 MB/s |
第二次测试: | 84.6 MB/s |
第三次测试: | 88.6 MB/s |
平均结果: | 83 MB/s |
带宽测试:
下载带宽: | 379.65 Mbit/s |
上传带宽: | 88.13 Mbit/s |
inbound 下载测试:
下载文件服务器 | 下载文件服务器 | 下载速度 |
---|---|---|
Node Name | IPv4 address | Download Speed |
CacheFly | 205.234.175.175 | 98.7MB/s |
Linode, Tokyo, JP | 106.187.96.148 | 55.6KB/s |
Linode, Singapore, SG | 139.162.23.4 | 4.86MB/s |
Linode, London, UK | 176.58.107.39 | 12.4MB/s |
Linode, Frankfurt, DE | 139.162.130.8 | 10.1MB/s |
Linode, Fremont, CA | 50.116.14.9 | 11.6MB/s |
Softlayer, Dallas, TX | 173.192.68.18 | 53.8MB/s |
Softlayer, Seattle, WA | 67.228.112.250 | 19.6MB/s |
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE | 159.122.69.4 | 16.1MB/s |
Softlayer, Singapore, SG | 119.81.28.170 | 6.46MB/s |
Softlayer, HongKong, CN | 119.81.130.170 | 7.84MB/s |
全国 ping 值总览:
线路 | 节点数量 | 最快节点 | 最慢节点 | 平均响应 |
---|---|---|---|---|
华北地区 | 10 | 北京 ( 青云 QingCloud 三区 A)245.4ms | 北京 ( 移动 )378.4ms | 325.7ms |
电信线路 | 39 | 广东佛山电信 (30CN.NET)209.3ms | 辽宁沈阳 ( 天翼云 )387.8ms | 307.1ms |
华东地区 | 33 | 江苏镇江 ( 电信 )227.9ms | 安徽合肥移动 370.4ms | 306.1ms |
移动线路 | 5 | 江苏常州 ( 移动 )270.3ms | 北京 ( 移动 )378.4ms | 346.8ms |
联通线路 | 11 | 重庆联通 250.1ms | 辽宁沈阳铁通 371.2ms | 275.5ms |
华南地区 | 11 | 广东佛山电信 (30CN.NET)209.3ms | 广州 ( 移动 )351.5ms | 291.5ms |
华中地区 | 3 | 湖北武汉 ( 天翼云 )282.3ms | 河南洛阳 (bgp)374.0ms | 326.8ms |
全部 | 74 | 广东佛山电信 (30CN.NET)209.3ms | 辽宁沈阳 ( 天翼云 )387.8ms | 309.4ms |
西北地区 | 2 | 陕西西安电信 ( 天翼云 )245.0ms | 陕西宝鸡电信 369.6ms | 307.3ms |
东北地区 | 7 | 吉林延边联通 276.0ms | 辽宁沈阳 ( 天翼云 )387.8ms | 348.2ms |
铁通线路 | 1 | 吉林长春铁通 385.6ms | 吉林长春铁通 385.6ms | 385.5ms |
西南地区 | 8 | 重庆电信 245.0ms | 四川德阳移动 363.9ms | 287.2ms |
Traceroute 路由测试:
上海电信(天翼云) 路由 :
跳数 | IP | 地区 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | * | N/A | * |
2 | 10.100.111.253 | 局域网 | 1.6 / 1.8 / 1.9 |
3 | 101.227.255.45 | 上海 电信 | 1 / 1.1 / 1.1 |
4 | * | N/A | * |
5 | 101.95.207.1 | 上海 电信 | 3.2 / 3.4 / 3 |
6 | 61.152.86.2 | 上海 电信 | 5.8 / 3.6 / 3.6 |
7 | * | N/A | * |
8 | 202.97.90.53 | 上海 电信 | 4.9 / 7 / 7 |
9 | 202.97.51.26 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 电信 | 270.3 / 268.7 / 268.6 |
10 | 202.97.50.233 | 上海 电信 | 285 / 283.7 / 287.6 |
11 | 213.248.92.129 | 美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶 telia.com | 160.6 / 159.8 / 160.2 |
12 | 62.115.118.246 | 美国德克萨斯州达拉斯 telia.com | 198.2 / 198.3 / 199.4 |
13 | 62.115.120.112 | 美国乔治亚州亚特兰大 telia.com | 328 / 328.2 / 330.7 |
14 | 213.155.137.123 | 美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特 telia.com | 332.4 / 334.8 / 334.7 |
15 | 62.115.40.230 | 美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特 telia.com | 348.9 / 348.3 / 348.1 |
16 | 199.255.156.130 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 356.2 / 365.3 / 356 |
17 | 199.191.57.194 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 346 / 352 / 344.7 |
18 | 199.255.159.17 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 351.9 / 350.6 / 351.3 |
19 | 192.254.65.214 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 341.8 / 342 / 341.4 |
20 | this server IP | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 328.3 / 329.5 / 334.5 |
杭州联通 路由 :
跳数 | IP | 地区 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | * | N/A | * |
2 | 172.31.10.2 | 局域网 | 0.4 / 0.3 / 0.5 |
3 | 172.31.123.65 | 局域网 | 35.2 / 41.3 / 0.9 |
4 | 124.160.81.105 | 浙江杭州 联通 | 1.2 / 1.2 / 1.3 |
5 | 124.160.81.185 | 浙江杭州 联通 | 12.9 |
6 | * | N/A | * |
7 | 219.158.97.2 | 广东广州 联通 | 23.7 |
8 | 219.158.103.34 | 广东广州 联通 | 30.9 |
9 | 219.158.25.118 | 美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞 联通 | 214.1 |
10 | 213.248.73.189 | 美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞 telia.com | 188.6 / 178.7 / 182.5 |
11 | 80.91.252.221 | 美国弗吉尼亚州阿什本 telia.com | 250.3 / 251.4 / 260.7 |
12 | 80.91.252.101 | 美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特 telia.com | 236.5 / 239.9 / 237.5 |
13 | 62.115.40.230 | 美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特 telia.com | 260.7 / 252.7 / 268.9 |
14 | 199.255.156.130 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 242.5 / 252.2 / 252.6 |
15 | 199.191.57.194 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 245 / 259.2 / 267.8 |
16 | 199.255.159.17 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 250.3 / 247.4 / 266 |
17 | 199.241.187.194 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 259.8 / 266.8 / 268.9 |
18 | this server IP | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 240.7 / 250.8 / 250.6 |
四川德阳移动 路由 :
跳数 | IP | 地区 | 延迟 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 117.174.59.1 | 四川德阳 移动 | 9.2 / 1.6 / 0.7 |
2 | 183.222.116.101 | 四川德阳 移动 | 1.3 / 1.2 / 1.1 |
3 | 223.87.25.17 | 四川成都 移动 | 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.2 |
4 | 221.183.19.45 | 四川成都 移动 | 2.1 / 1.9 / 1.9 |
5 | 221.176.18.181 | 广东广州 移动 | 41.2 / 41.2 / 41.3 |
6 | 221.176.24.6 | 广东广州 移动 | 38.3 / 41.6 / 43.7 |
7 | 221.183.25.117 | 广东广州 移动 | 37.3 |
8 | 221.183.55.57 | 上海 移动 | 37.1 / 37.6 / 37.3 |
9 | 223.120.13.173 | 美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞 移动 | 200.4 / 199.1 / 202.2 |
10 | 223.120.6.70 | 美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞 移动 | 197.3 / 197.3 / 197.2 |
11 | 213.248.75.236 | 美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞 telia.com | 203.8 / 202.9 / 203.3 |
12 | 80.91.252.221 | 美国弗吉尼亚州阿什本 telia.com | 264.1 / 264.1 / 264.1 |
13 | 80.91.252.101 | 美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特 telia.com | 358.7 |
14 | 62.115.40.230 | 美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特 telia.com | 360.3 / 360.9 / 361.1 |
15 | 199.255.156.130 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 358 / 358.9 / 366.8 |
16 | * | N/A | * |
17 | 199.255.159.17 | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 360.7 / 360.2 / 359.9 |
18 | * | N/A | * |
19 | this server IP | 美国北卡罗来纳州勒诺 centrilogic.com | 364.2 |
回程路由测试:
广州电信(天翼云) 回程:
Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. the first row hidden 0.0% 10 24.7 2.9 0.3 24.7 7.7 2. 192.254.65.213 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 3. 199.255.159.18 0.0% 10 0.3 1.8 0.2 9.2 2.9 4. dct-ds42-ve33.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.3 5. dct-cr03--v55.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.3 1.9 0.2 10.9 3.7 6. cha-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 3.0 3.2 3.0 4.6 0.5 7. ash-bb3-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 9.7 9.8 9.6 10.4 0.2 8. ash-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 12.7 12.9 12.7 13.5 0.3 9. 218.30.53.53 0.0% 10 13.4 13.3 11.2 17.8 2.2 10. 202.97.49.110 10.0% 10 189.9 192.9 189.9 195.9 2.2 11. 202.97.60.249 0.0% 10 340.9 340.9 338.8 342.9 1.3 12. 202.97.94.78 20.0% 10 325.9 326.7 324.7 327.3 0.9 13. 202.97.90.205 10.0% 10 330.1 329.8 323.7 333.7 3.1 14. 183.59.12.229 30.0% 10 328.3 329.8 327.0 330.7 1.5 15. 183.56.129.10 10.0% 10 328.2 329.9 327.8 330.5 1.1 16. 14.215.116.1 10.0% 10 325.1 327.4 325.1 330.9 1.6
上海电信(天翼云) 回程:
Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. the first row hidden 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.1 2. 192.254.65.213 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 3. 199.255.159.18 0.0% 10 2.0 3.7 0.3 10.9 3.8 4. dct-ds42-ve33.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.8 4.6 0.2 10.8 4.3 5. dct-cr03--v55.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 6. cha-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 3.0 3.1 3.0 4.0 0.3 7. ash-bb4-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.8 0.0 8. ash-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 9.7 9.8 9.7 10.1 0.1 9. 218.30.53.53 0.0% 10 12.6 14.2 10.2 17.7 2.8 10. 202.97.49.229 0.0% 10 179.6 160.9 135.4 181.1 14.4 11. 202.97.50.1 10.0% 10 437.1 424.6 401.6 443.7 13.2 12. 202.97.90.30 40.0% 10 429.5 419.1 405.2 434.4 11.1 13. 202.97.24.141 10.0% 10 431.5 419.7 378.8 443.0 19.1 14. 101.95.120.109 10.0% 10 438.7 423.3 389.2 445.8 17.6 15. 124.74.166.150 90.0% 10 389.2 389.2 389.2 389.2 0.0 16. 124.74.232.238 10.0% 10 436.7 427.6 378.4 459.4 26.7 17. 101.227.255.45 20.0% 10 416.8 392.4 357.7 417.4 22.3
厦门电信 CN2 回程:
Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. the first row hidden 0.0% 10 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.1 2. 199.241.187.193 0.0% 10 0.4 1.9 0.2 15.9 4.9 3. 199.255.159.18 0.0% 10 3.1 3.9 0.2 11.7 4.4 4. dct-ds42-ve33.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 9.9 2.3 0.2 10.3 4.1 5. dct-cr03--v55.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.3 3.1 0.2 20.2 6.5 6. cha-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.1 0.1 7. atl-b22-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 8.2 8.9 8.1 10.5 0.8 8. dls-b22-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 25.7 25.8 25.6 27.0 0.4 9. las-b24-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 57.2 59.2 57.0 65.5 3.2 10. chinatelecom-ic-320371-las-b 0.0% 10 58.9 57.8 57.5 58.9 0.4 11. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15. 27.148.195.62 0.0% 10 231.0 241.4 231.0 269.6 15.9 16. 110.80.143.170 10.0% 10 222.8 229.2 222.8 235.7 4.9 17. 117.25.156.126 70.0% 10 233.8 234.0 233.8 234.2 0.2 18. 117.25.141.150 11.1% 9 232.9 228.2 224.2 238.0 5.6 19. 117.28.254.129 11.1% 9 232.8 231.4 228.5 233.8 1.9
重庆联通 回程:
Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. the first row hidden 0.0% 10 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.1 2. 199.241.187.193 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 3. 199.255.159.18 0.0% 10 0.3 4.1 0.3 10.5 4.3 4. dct-ds42-ve33.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 11.3 4.8 0.2 11.3 4.5 5. dct-cr03--v55.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 6. cha-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 0.0 7. atl-b22-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 14.0 9.3 8.1 14.0 1.8 8. dls-b22-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 25.7 25.6 25.6 25.9 0.1 9. las-b24-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 59.1 59.4 57.0 73.3 5.1 10. chinaunicom-ic-151188-las-bb 0.0% 10 251.6 256.8 251.6 269.3 5.8 11. 219.158.96.25 0.0% 10 256.9 255.6 250.6 260.6 3.6 12. 219.158.3.49 0.0% 10 238.4 239.9 236.0 244.7 3.1 13. 219.158.4.169 0.0% 10 250.7 254.0 250.7 258.7 2.7 14. 219.158.12.70 10.0% 10 253.8 255.4 250.9 259.7 2.9 15. 113.207.25.214 10.0% 10 247.7 249.7 246.9 258.3 4.2 16. 113.207.25.54 10.0% 10 271.4 387.1 270.3 1288. 338.0 17. 113.207.32.65 10.0% 10 269.8 273.7 269.6 283.1 5.0
上海移动 回程:
Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. the first row hidden 0.0% 10 0.3 0.7 0.3 1.3 0.4 2. 192.254.65.213 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0 3. 199.255.159.18 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.2 4. dct-ds42-ve33.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.3 5.0 0.3 11.3 3.9 5. dct-cr03--v55.dacentec.com 0.0% 10 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.2 6. cha-b1-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 3.0 5.7 3.0 29.7 8.4 7. atl-b22-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 8.6 8.8 8.2 10.4 0.8 8. dls-b22-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 25.6 25.8 25.6 27.2 0.5 9. las-b24-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 58.4 58.8 57.0 63.6 2.6 10. chinamobile-ic-327136-las-b2 0.0% 10 154.0 153.7 153.2 154.0 0.3 11. 223.120.6.17 20.0% 10 153.5 153.5 153.1 153.9 0.3 12. 223.120.13.54 30.0% 10 335.1 334.7 334.1 335.7 0.6 13. 221.183.55.30 30.0% 10 349.1 349.6 349.1 351.1 0.7 14. 221.183.25.189 40.0% 10 349.7 349.8 349.5 350.1 0.2 15. 221.176.17.217 40.0% 10 349.5 349.8 348.9 351.2 0.8 16. 221.183.13.154 70.0% 10 348.4 352.8 348.4 360.4 6.6 17. . 70.0% 10 350.6 350.9 350.6 351.0 0.2 18. . 40.0% 10 358.0 354.3 353.2 358.0 1.9 19. . 22.2% 9 391.2 357.2 351.2 391.2 15.0 20. . 11.1% 9 351.8 352.8 350.8 357.0 2.2
海外服务器 Ping 测试:
Linode 日本 :
PING speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=172 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=167 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=167 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=167 ms 64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=167 ms --- speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4170ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 167.778/168.712/172.396/1.842 ms
Vultr 日本 :
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=183 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=183 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=183 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=183 ms 64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=5 ttl=49 time=183 ms --- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4189ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 183.482/183.524/183.618/0.544 ms
Budgetvm 洛杉矶 :
PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=57.7 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=57.6 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=57.7 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=57.6 ms 64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=57.7 ms --- 192.157.214.6 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4065ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 57.696/57.718/57.748/0.153 ms loss, time 13999ms
星光韩国 KT :
PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=238 time=184 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=238 time=184 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=238 time=184 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=238 time=194 ms 64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=238 time=184 ms --- 210.92.18.1 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4188ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 184.067/186.199/194.147/4.012 ms
UnixBench 跑分测试:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: data: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Tue Mar 21 19:29:05 UTC 2017 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 1385 (5427.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 1385 (5427.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 2: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 1385 (5427.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 3: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 1385 (5427.8 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, AMD virtualization, SYSCALL/SYSRET 05:20:27 up 1 day, 10:22, 0 users, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 01 2018 05:20:27 - 05:48:24 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24118294.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2439.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 946.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 625775.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 178386.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1134659.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1306335.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 49442.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3718.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1755.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2043.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1867813.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24118294.9 2066.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2439.4 443.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 946.1 220.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 625775.4 1580.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 178386.2 1077.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1134659.0 1956.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1306335.4 1050.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 49442.5 123.6 Process Creation 126.0 3718.8 295.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1755.3 414.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2043.0 3405.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1867813.6 1245.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 772.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 01 2018 05:48:24 - 06:16:24 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 95798494.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 9765.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 13946.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 583116.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 155547.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1520824.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 5194882.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 929096.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 48032.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17086.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2272.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4164317.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 95798494.0 8209.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9765.5 1775.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 13946.5 3243.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 583116.0 1472.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 155547.5 939.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1520824.2 2622.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5194882.7 4176.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 929096.2 2322.7 Process Creation 126.0 48032.9 3812.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17086.3 4029.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2272.8 3788.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4164317.2 2776.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2834.4